Whatever possessed vice-president Kamala Harris to pick Minnesota governor Tim Walz as her running mate, it probably wasn’t a desire to inflame arguments about apostrophes. But it doesn’t take much to get grammar nerds fired up. “The lower the stakes, the bigger the fight,” said Ron Woloshun, a creative director and digital marketer in California who jumped into the fray on social media less than an hour after Harris selected Walz last week to offer his take on possessive proper nouns.
The Associated Press Stylebook says “use only an apostrophe” for singular proper names ending in S: Dickens’ novels, Hercules’ labours, Jesus’ life. But not everyone agrees.
Debate about possessive proper names ending in S started soon after Prez Joe Biden cleared the way for Harris to run last month. Is it Harris’ or Harris’s? But the selection of Walz with his sounds-like-an-s surname really ramped it up, said Benjamin Dreyer, the retired copy chief at Random House and author of “Dreyer’s English: An Utterly Correct Guide to Clarity and Style”. Dreyer was inundated with questions within minutes of the announcement, which came while he was at the dentist. “I was like, ‘All right, everybody just has to chill.'”
While there is widespread agreement that Walz’s is correct, confusion persists about Harris’ vs. Harris’s. Dreyer’s verdict? Add the ‘s. “To set the ‘s is just simpler, and then you can take your valuable brain cells and apply them to more important things,” he said.
Woloshun chimed in with a similar opinion on X, where apostrophes are being thrown around like hand grenades. “The rule is simple: If you say the S, spell the S,” he argued. That puts them on the same side as New York Times, Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal – and at odds with AP.
While AP style has evolved on many fronts over the years, there are no immediate plans to change the guidance on possessives, said Amanda Barrett, AP’s vice-president for news standards and inclusion. “This is a longstanding policy for the AP. It has served us well, and we’ve not seen any real need to change,” she said. “We do know that the conversation is out there and people make different choices, and that’s all fine. “
Merriam-Webster, the oldest dictionary publisher in America, splits the difference: For names ending in an S or Z sound, you can add ‘s or just an apostrophe, though the dictionary says ‘s is the more common choice. Timothy Pulju, a senior lecturer in linguistics at Dartmouth College, said that until the 17th or 18th century, the possessive of proper names ending in S – such as Jesus or Moses – often was simply the name itself with no apostrophe or additional S. Eventually, the apostrophe was added (Jesus’ or Moses’) to denote possession, though the pronunciation remained the same.
“That became kind of the standard that I was taught and adhere to, even though in retrospect, I don’t think it’s a great standard,” he said. That’s because linguists view writing as a representation of speech, and speech has changed since then. Pulju said he expects the ‘s form to become dominant eventually. But for now, he – agreeing with Merriam-Webster – says either way is acceptable. “As long as people are communicating successfully,” he said. “They’re not getting confused about whose running mate Tim Walz is.”
If she wins in Nov, Harris would become the fourth US prez with a last name ending in S and the first since Rutherford B Hayes, who was elected in 1876 – 130 years before the founding of Twitter – and was spared the social media frenzy over apostrophes. Harris is the first nominee with such a tricky last name since 1988, when Democrat Michael Dukakis lost to George H W Bush. Dukakis, now 90, said in a phone interview Monday that he doesn’t recall any similar discussion when he was the nominee. But he agrees with the AP. “It sounds to me like it would be s, apostrophe, and that’s it,” he said.
The Harris campaign, meanwhile, has yet to take a clear stand. A press release on Monday by her New Hampshire team touted “Harris’s positive vision”, a day after her national press office wrote about “Harris’ seventh trip to Nevada.”
The Associated Press Stylebook says “use only an apostrophe” for singular proper names ending in S: Dickens’ novels, Hercules’ labours, Jesus’ life. But not everyone agrees.
Debate about possessive proper names ending in S started soon after Prez Joe Biden cleared the way for Harris to run last month. Is it Harris’ or Harris’s? But the selection of Walz with his sounds-like-an-s surname really ramped it up, said Benjamin Dreyer, the retired copy chief at Random House and author of “Dreyer’s English: An Utterly Correct Guide to Clarity and Style”. Dreyer was inundated with questions within minutes of the announcement, which came while he was at the dentist. “I was like, ‘All right, everybody just has to chill.'”
While there is widespread agreement that Walz’s is correct, confusion persists about Harris’ vs. Harris’s. Dreyer’s verdict? Add the ‘s. “To set the ‘s is just simpler, and then you can take your valuable brain cells and apply them to more important things,” he said.
Woloshun chimed in with a similar opinion on X, where apostrophes are being thrown around like hand grenades. “The rule is simple: If you say the S, spell the S,” he argued. That puts them on the same side as New York Times, Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal – and at odds with AP.
While AP style has evolved on many fronts over the years, there are no immediate plans to change the guidance on possessives, said Amanda Barrett, AP’s vice-president for news standards and inclusion. “This is a longstanding policy for the AP. It has served us well, and we’ve not seen any real need to change,” she said. “We do know that the conversation is out there and people make different choices, and that’s all fine. “
Merriam-Webster, the oldest dictionary publisher in America, splits the difference: For names ending in an S or Z sound, you can add ‘s or just an apostrophe, though the dictionary says ‘s is the more common choice. Timothy Pulju, a senior lecturer in linguistics at Dartmouth College, said that until the 17th or 18th century, the possessive of proper names ending in S – such as Jesus or Moses – often was simply the name itself with no apostrophe or additional S. Eventually, the apostrophe was added (Jesus’ or Moses’) to denote possession, though the pronunciation remained the same.
“That became kind of the standard that I was taught and adhere to, even though in retrospect, I don’t think it’s a great standard,” he said. That’s because linguists view writing as a representation of speech, and speech has changed since then. Pulju said he expects the ‘s form to become dominant eventually. But for now, he – agreeing with Merriam-Webster – says either way is acceptable. “As long as people are communicating successfully,” he said. “They’re not getting confused about whose running mate Tim Walz is.”
If she wins in Nov, Harris would become the fourth US prez with a last name ending in S and the first since Rutherford B Hayes, who was elected in 1876 – 130 years before the founding of Twitter – and was spared the social media frenzy over apostrophes. Harris is the first nominee with such a tricky last name since 1988, when Democrat Michael Dukakis lost to George H W Bush. Dukakis, now 90, said in a phone interview Monday that he doesn’t recall any similar discussion when he was the nominee. But he agrees with the AP. “It sounds to me like it would be s, apostrophe, and that’s it,” he said.
The Harris campaign, meanwhile, has yet to take a clear stand. A press release on Monday by her New Hampshire team touted “Harris’s positive vision”, a day after her national press office wrote about “Harris’ seventh trip to Nevada.”
Source : Times of India
